Benjamin Peterson <[email protected]> added the comment: 2010/12/4 Thomas Vander Stichele <[email protected]>: > > Thomas Vander Stichele <[email protected]> added the comment: > > Maybe I am missing something, but why was it ok for this patch to move > EXTENDED_ARGS from 143 to 145 ? I thought the numbers for opcodes were part > of the ABI ?
Very much not. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <[email protected]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue6101> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
