Martin v. Löwis <mar...@v.loewis.de> added the comment:

I think this patch (nonblock2.patch) is wrong. If I have a non-blocking server 
socket on *BSD, and do accept, with no default timeout: IIUC, under the patch, 
I will get a blocking connection socket. However, according to the operating 
system API, I'm entitled to get a non-blocking socket (i.e. O_NONBLOCK must be 
inherited across accept).

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue7995>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to