Alexander Belopolsky <belopol...@users.sourceforge.net> added the comment:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 5:06 AM, anatoly techtonik <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote: .. > IIUC #9527 is about datetime and this request is about time.localtime, This is correct, but did you notice what I wrote in my last message? """ In order to properly implement #9527 in datetime.py, some kind of tm_gmtoff support will need to be added to the time module, but I don't want this to become a feature that is exclusively available from the time module. """ I am not rejecting this request, I am trying to consolidate two closely related issues. Can you explain why you believe this functionality should be provided exclusively through the time module and not be available in datetime? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1667546> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
