Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: [...] > > gcc-4.6 -O1 -ftree-vectorize > ------------------------------------- > 0x0000000000480991 <+5041>: mov %eax,%ecx > 0x0000000000480993 <+5043>: sub %edx,%ecx > 0x0000000000480995 <+5045>: mov %ecx,(%r12,%rax,4) > 0x0000000000480999 <+5049>: movzbl 0x0(%rbp,%rax,1),%ecx > 0x000000000048099e <+5054>: lea 0x1(%rdx),%esi > 0x00000000004809a1 <+5057>: cmp $0x9,%cl > 0x00000000004809a4 <+5060>: cmovne %edx,%esi > 0x00000000004809a7 <+5063>: cmove %esi,%edx > 0x00000000004809aa <+5066>: setne %cl > 0x00000000004809ad <+5069>: movzbl %cl,%ecx > 0x00000000004809b0 <+5072>: lea 0x1(%rax,%rcx,2),%rax > 0x00000000004809b5 <+5077>: cmp %rax,%rdi > 0x00000000004809b8 <+5080>: jg 0x480991 <PyCode_Optimize+5041> > -------------------------------------
Looks like code generation is borked. (it lacks a compare to 0x59 or 0x5a (90), and "setne" wouldn't be the right instruction anyway) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue9880> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
