Eli Bendersky <[email protected]> added the comment: Nick, I read the protocol of issue 4296 and I understand the reasoning behind the code, but I still think the naming is mightily confusing. Two distinct changes went into a single function (A) Return -1/0/+1 instead of PyObject and (B) the id() shortcut, and its name is inappropriate. Were an API change feasible, some other naming would be better.
> "It may be worth explicitly pointing out that use cases where this assumption > is unacceptable would be better served by direct invocation RichCompare > function." Do you mean write it down in the docs? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <[email protected]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue10912> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
