Alexander Belopolsky <belopol...@users.sourceforge.net> added the comment:
David, Can you weigh in on this? I am -1 on improving Internaldate2tuple(). I think the module should provide a function that would return an aware datetime object instead of a timetuple. The proposed patch will make error reporting from Internaldate2tuple() inconsistent: invalid bytes result in None return while non-ASCII characters in strings would raise an encoding error. While I don't like the "if not mo: return None" logic, if compatibility with 2.x is the goal, encoding errors should be caught and converted to return None. ---------- nosy: +belopolsky, r.david.murray type: behavior -> feature request versions: +Python 3.3 -Python 3.2 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue10947> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
