On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 17:40:50 -0600, Zachary Ware <zachary.ware+py...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Zachary Ware > <zachary.ware+py...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I had intended to audit all of the builders and come up with a new > > stable set months ago, but it hasn't happened yet. I'll see whether I > > can find some time to get anywhere on that this week. > > Here's the breakdown as I see it currently: > > "Stable" (all tests pass on all branches, or have failures that look > legitimate): > angelico-debian-amd64 > bolen-tiger > bolen-windows7 > edelsohn-debian-z > edelsohn-fedora-ppc64 > edelsohn-fedora-ppc64le > edelsohn-rhel-z > edelsohn-sles-z > gps-debian-profile-opt > gps-ubuntu-exynos5-armv71 > kloth-win64 > koobs-freebsd9 > koobs-freebsd10 > langa-ubuntu > murray-snowleopard > ware-docs > ware-gentoo-x86 > ware-win81-release > > "Iffy" (have failures that look related to the slave, but are > platforms that should be stable. If I reshuffle right now, they'll be > marked unstable): > bolen-ubuntu > bolen-windows > bolen-windows8 > bolen-windows10 > > "Unstable" (have longstanding failures due to slave or platform, or is > an explicitly experimental (for python) platform): > borja-openbsd-x86 > bruynooghe-solaris-csw > cea-indiana-x86 > edelsohn-aix-ppc64 > intel-ubuntu-skylake > *-icc > koobs-freebsd11 > speed-python > > "Kill" (hasn't been connected in months; I'll remove it): > cea-indiana-amd64 > > > Anyone have any thoughts on this before I do the shuffling? Also, > I'll note that there's a strange issue with 2.7 that affects three of > the otherwise stable bots where the regrtest process doesn't die, > leaving buildbot to kill it.
I haven't reviewed the logs myself, but looking at what is in the lists based on your judgement, this looks fine to me. I do think we want to resolve the bolen issues and not just move them to unstable, though. It looks like jcea brought the OpenIndiana buildbot back on-line, but it seems to have gotten into trouble processing the backlog. The backlog could just be cancelled; there's not much point in running it. It would be nice to have that bot back, since IIRC it was one of the fastest and so gave quick feedback on bad changesets. However...this is a big enough list of additions to stable that we might want to contact either the release managers or python-dev before making the change. --David _______________________________________________ Python-Buildbots mailing list Python-Buildbots@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-buildbots
