https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/5746e067fd07c9ec396e2594eb128f9418acb277 commit: 5746e067fd07c9ec396e2594eb128f9418acb277 branch: 3.14 author: Miss Islington (bot) <31488909+miss-isling...@users.noreply.github.com> committer: hugovk <1324225+hug...@users.noreply.github.com> date: 2025-07-25T19:08:28+03:00 summary:
[3.14] gh-137090: Remove redundant statement in ``Doc/library/concurrent.interpreters.rst`` (GH-137091) (#137108) gh-137090: Remove redundant statement in ``Doc/library/concurrent.interpreters.rst`` (GH-137091) (cherry picked from commit 1e69cd1634e4f0f8c375be85d11925bd12deef23) Co-authored-by: soolabettu <17737361+soolabe...@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Adam Turner <9087854+aa-tur...@users.noreply.github.com> files: M Doc/library/concurrent.interpreters.rst diff --git a/Doc/library/concurrent.interpreters.rst b/Doc/library/concurrent.interpreters.rst index be9d565f8e0d38..41ea6af3b226e9 100644 --- a/Doc/library/concurrent.interpreters.rst +++ b/Doc/library/concurrent.interpreters.rst @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ makes them similar to processes, but they still enjoy in-process efficiency, like threads. All that said, interpreters do naturally support certain flavors of -concurrency, as a powerful side effect of that isolation. +concurrency. There's a powerful side effect of that isolation. It enables a different approach to concurrency than you can take with async or threads. It's a similar concurrency model to CSP or the actor model, _______________________________________________ Python-checkins mailing list -- python-checkins@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-checkins-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3//lists/python-checkins.python.org Member address: arch...@mail-archive.com
