-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Oct 2, 2008, at 12:31 PM, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
IMHO if there's still big scary stuff out there, calling this a
release candidate does us no good PR-wise, and does no good for our
users. 3.0 is going to be scary enough for them as it is - cutting a
release candidate that we either know is broken, or else has
significant changes, is a very bad idea.
I concur. Better to go through another beta.
It feels like 3.0 is being rushed.
I agree. I'm swamped right now, but I will try to put together a
revised schedule proposal later tonight.
Someone please distract Guido while I "borrow" the keys to the time
machine.
- -Barry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
iQCVAwUBSOT4nnEjvBPtnXfVAQLR3QP+NW6g5vNb6Avqk42lXg1I0vvhYn7UoR5q
Of7u7OSjuir2rK3srvZyzsUuPNeFANY1vNwPD+j3WT2fL+ZgdVzefYHNGtk3CPG6
L9NvTRvMhj17rFjFMV9hng5CgCS4bKGfg5/yrKeOBL8/MPeQfF2p3+UWYdBWNAfV
p+1vmjTMcUk=
=LdRB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
