The survey isn't biased. You have a value "the same /worse than the status
quo" - wherein the status quo is subversion. If you hate DVCes, you mark it
as "same/worse than the status quo" and we move on.
No one is suggesting we accept *less* functionality than subversion: in
fact we're looking at these for *more* functionality.
On Feb 27, 2009 7:04pm, Fredrik Lundh <[email protected]> wrote:
No need for a long answer - just explain what the purpose of the survey
is, and why it isn't as biasad as it appears to be. A process where
you're actively discouraging people with a certain opinion from getting
involved isn't much of a process.
On Feb 27, 2009 9:24 PM, "Brett Cannon" [email protected]> wrote:
I had a long reply all written out, but instead I decided to discard it
so as to not continue to drag this discussion out. Why? The DVCS PEP is
not even finished yet!
Can you guys please let me finish the PEP before you start worrying about
whether we are going to switch? At least give me the chance to make a
decision on whether I think it is reasonable to switch and what to switch
to. And then we can have a reasonable conversation where I update the PEP
to address any questions that come up.
-Brett
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 02:59, Fredrik Lundh [email protected]>
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 27, ...
_______________________________________________
python-committers mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
