Le dimanche 05 décembre 2010 à 20:00 +0100, "Martin v. Löwis" a écrit : > Am 05.12.2010 12:11, schrieb Georg Brandl: > > Am 05.12.2010 11:26, schrieb Nick Coghlan: > >> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Raymond Hettinger > >> <raymond.hettin...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> On Dec 5, 2010, at 2:14 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > >>>> Do we wait until after the 3.2 release now, or > >>>> just until after the holidays? > >>> > >>> +1 for waiting until after the 3.2 release. > >>> It is just around the corner. > >> > >> It would be nice to have the structure of the build information > >> consistent across the whole 3.2.x series though. > > > > That, and I'd like to not have to make another maintenance branch > > in SVN for 3.2. > > Then I'd like to repeat my request not to switch to Mercurial just > before the release candidate - have at least one beta release > before the Mercurial switch. > > Personally, I'd still like to defer beta1 until after the Mercurial > switch (or alternatively, do the final 3.2 release from subversion > as Raymond suggested).
What would these proposed delayings / deferments achieve? _______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
