-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 29.01.2011 11:16, schrieb Łukasz Langa: > W dniu 2011-01-29 06:15, Steve Holden pisze: >>> If the module weren't already broken for most real-world purposes I'd >>> no question want to wait. As it is I'm on the fence. >> Me too, but I did want to acknowledge the correctness of Antoine's >> argument. Yes, I reminded people (using multiprocessing as an example, >> which I agree was probably not a fair parallel) that ignoring process >> can have negative consequences, but I do agree with you about the >> desirability of not having to wait for 3.3. > > Gentlemen. It was disappointing to see serious ideas about pushing > feature commits after the beta (and even during the RC phase) or > sneaking in controversial changes in respect to the moratorium. All > these risky suggestions came from the fact that we are afraid to miss a > release and be forced to wait another year or two. Maybe let's eat the > cake and have it too. We could do that by shortening the release cycle > from now on. How about that?
Sure -- I take it you're volunteering to be RM? Georg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk1D6ywACgkQN9GcIYhpnLCaXgCePUa00PitA9Tr0s5Vm1h8ZS+g fzEAn3STkH1evzytNuw7fZR7+F+bkAS+ =3hsV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
