On 30/01/2012 16:59, Brett Cannon wrote:


On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:37, Barry Warsaw <ba...@python.org <mailto:ba...@python.org>> wrote:

    On Jan 30, 2012, at 04:32 PM, Michael Foord wrote:

    >If you have any other topics you think would be good to discuss
    please let me
    >know.

    I'm really looking forward to the summit this year, thanks for all
    the great
    work in putting it together.

    Another topic (possibly) is the splitting of the stdlib from the core
    interpreter repo.  We have more experience now with Mercurial to
    know whether
    this is feasible, and hopefully we'll have enough representation
    from the
    other implementations to know whether it would still be useful.


Since I have not heard anything about a VM summit (although I'm sure it would be easy to have a spontaneous one on Thursday), we might want to discuss how we want to get the benchmarks inline for Python 3 and then what we can do to get speed.python.org <http://speed.python.org> going. And all of this plays into what the other VMs need from CPython for Python 3 support to be easier.
Instead of a VM summit this year we are having a web development summit on the Thursday before the conference, organised by Chris McDonough. An informal vm summit would be fine if you can get people together.

I've added your and Barry's suggestions to the agenda for the language summit, plus one from Steve Holden on what (more) the PSF can do for alternative implementations.

All the best,

Michael Foord

--
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/

May you do good and not evil
May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others
May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
-- the sqlite blessing http://www.sqlite.org/different.html

_______________________________________________
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers

Reply via email to