On 17/03/14 15:16, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: > However, I would advise against doing so now, and delay the addition > of the 3.4 branch until 3.3 is retired from bug fixing, and then > repurpose all 3.3 configuration for 3.4. Otherwise, some slaves might > run out of disk space.
Are you actually talking about 3.2?. I am surprised that you propose to delay 3.4 buildbots now that it is the "current" release. Doesn't make sense to me. Why not drop 3.2 and do only 2.7, 3.3, 3.4 and default (future 3.5)?. -- Jesús Cea Avión _/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ j...@jcea.es - http://www.jcea.es/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ Twitter: @jcea _/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/_/_/ jabber / xmpp:j...@jabber.org _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ "Things are not so easy" _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ "My name is Dump, Core Dump" _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/ "El amor es poner tu felicidad en la felicidad de otro" - Leibniz
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
