On 20 September 2015 at 03:04, Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org> wrote: > > Le 19/09/2015 18:45, Nick Coghlan a écrit : >> >> That's part of it, but I also think we (as in those of us with commit >> privileges that are also professional developers) bear the >> responsibility for deciding how transparent we want to be about the >> commercial aspects of the development process that have emerged over >> time, rather than having that responsibility fall on the PSF. > > You have a very good point here. Thank you for spelling it.
I've posted a draft patch at http://bugs.python.org/issue25194 Based on this discussion, I used the "disclosure of interests" aspect as the primary framing - the specific name, "Register of Financial Interests", is often used for that purpose in a political context. The stakes are much lower here, so the proposal is limited to only covering our primary financial interest, and even then remaining entirely voluntary, but the general concept is the same: providing folks with relevant background information while holding a position that grants structural power above and beyond our personal influence with others. I've suggested 5 draft categories based on my personal knowledge of what some of the other core developers do for a living: * Consultants and Freelance Developers * Software Development Education & Training * Commercial Python Redistributors * Other Commercial Organizations * Non-Commercial Organizations Regards, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
