On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 at 12:49 Neil Schemenauer <nas-pyt...@arctrix.com> wrote:
> On 2015-12-15, Vinay Sajip wrote: > > Brett Cannon <brett <at> python.org> writes: > > > Also realize that anyone who says they will walk away will be held to > > > their word; if we still choose to switch to GitHub I will expect you to > > > no longer contribute to Python and will personally hold you to your > word > > > > seems a little strong. Even principled people can change their minds > about > > things, can't they? To me, this does come across like an ultimatum > (Stefan's > > word) or a threat (your word) > > I agree this is too strong. If people don't want to use GitHub, > they can clone from a different repos, maybe PSF can even provide > one. Patches can be sent using the 'git am' command. I don't see > why not using GitHub means you can't contribute to Python. We would > be rejecting valuable contributions for no good reason. > You could say something like "you will not get commit access through > GitHub". I.e. you will have to get someone else to commit or pull > your changes. > That's exactly what I meant; I'm not going to push to ban someone from uploading a patch to bugs.python.org. This is entirely about commit/push privileges and who would relinquish them if we switched to GitHub (and simply expecting them to follow through on their relinquishment if they said they would).
_______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
