On 07/22/2016 06:41 PM, Brett Cannon wrote: > > > On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 at 06:02 Xavier de Gaye <xdeg...@gmail.com <mailto:xdeg...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > It seems that the configure file on the default branch has been generated with > autoconf 2.70. Autoconf 2.70 has not yet been released [1]. The differences > between the generated configure files with 2.69 and 2.70 are a few lines [3] > added by 2.70 with 'runstatedir' in them. The last old discussion on the > usage of different autoconf versions [2] does not really answer the following > question: > > I am using 2.69, should a commit that changes configure.ac <http://configure.ac> respects the > existing 'runstatedir' lines added by a previous commit or uses directly the > configure file generated by 2.69 ? > > > If autoconf 2.70 is not released yet then it's fine to regenerate configure w/ 2.69. > > -Brett
Changeset 816ae3abd928 regenerated the configure script with 'runstatedir' again. AFAIK Autoconf 2.70 has still not yet been released. Please let us stick with 2.69. Xavier _______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
