On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Victor Stinner <victor.stin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Oh ok, I see. Let's say that we wait one month to see how things are > going before changing the process ;-)
I'd say we do it and see if it is worth keep it that way. - The PR tests are passing and we have an incentive to maintain that. - The only tests which have a Red mark (failing ci) are not those whose branches are not rebased against the HEAD of master. So, if we make it a requirement, authors will have to rebase their changes on top origin/master HEAD, and will get accurate test information for their PR. -- Senthil _______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
