On 10 March 2017 at 04:32, Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, 9 Mar 2017 at 04:07 Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 9 March 2017 at 19:30, Victor Stinner <victor.stin...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Do we need need a kind of sandbox repository for experiments? >> >> >> Mine aren't experiments, they're temporary branches from using the online >> editor for minor fixups (GitHub doesn't give you the option to put those in >> your fork if you have merge access on the main repo). >> > > In general I expect none of those branches to live longer than 24 hours as > the PRs they were created for should be merged in less than an hour. If a > branch is older than a day then it means someone probably forgot to delete > the branch after merging a PR. >
That was the case for one of mine, but for the other, it was a matter of needing to run "git remote prune" to clean up the already deleted branch for anyone that had sync'ed it already. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
_______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
