Hi,

First, I'm really happy that we moved to git and GH. The GH review tool is super convenient and CI integration helps.

I'm less happy about requiring to make a PR for every commit. It's a no problem for new features development, but it's a huge pain for a bug fixing workflow. Last week I needed to push a bunch of bug fixes to 3.7/3.6/3.5. I had about 6 pull requests to the master branch, + 12 more for 3.6 and 3.5. I basically killed my entire second half of the day waiting until CI checks clear out. I spend a few hours pushing just 3 (!!) committs to all branches. Thanks to Brett, who disabled the push CI check for a while, I was able to push the remaining 3 bug fixes and their cherry picks in under 10 minutes.

Yesterday I was working on a few asyncio PRs and a bug in async/await. All PRs required cherry-picking. Again, I was spending significant amount of time just creating branches/PRs for cherry-picking. Again waiting for CI checks (even thougn I always run the test suite before I push). In the end of the day, I was so frustrated and discouraged that I just stopped working on CPython.

The current workflow makes it significantly harder for me to be productive. At this point I'm so discouraged of working on any bug fixes that I consider to stop working on them until the full cherry-picking automation is implemented.

So I guess what I'm asking for is to consider turning the CI/PR push requirement off until we have automatic cherry-picking and a new NEWS file workflow. We lived without this check for many years with mercurial. Yes, all of us pushed some broken commits, but we have buildbots and CI, so nothing horrible ever happended.

Thank you,
Yury


On 2017-03-10 5:13 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
I can't believe it's been 4 weeks. It feels like it was ages/yesterday when we moved. :)

First, I hope people are not regretting letting/having me make this migration. I know there have been some things to work through (and others still to come), but I hope this is all a net positive (either now or in the near future).

Second, I wanted to get initial feedback on things we can easily tweak:

  * Requiring Travis to pass (I *really* don't want to turn this off
    as we already had a broken build when I temporarily turned it off
    at someone's request when Travis was backed up from the AWS S3
    outage; I also don't plan to make AppVeyor required unless there's
    a way to make it be skipped for doc-only changes)
  * Cherry-picking working out? (We can go back to forward merging if
    people really want to, but I think long-term cherry-picking will
    allow for more automation)
      o Along with that, are the labels for cherry-picking working
        out? (Some devs seem to like using title labels like `[3.6]`
        to flag cherry-picks so it's more obvious in emails so I don't
        know if the labels are really that useful)
  * Is the mention bot helpful? (Our config is at
    https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/master/.mention-bot and the
    docs are at https://github.com/facebook/mention-bot)
  * Anything to tweak about the coverage bot and reports? (Our config
    is at
    https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/master/.codecov.yml and
    docs at https://docs.codecov.io/docs/codecov-yaml)

Third, I wanted to point out some of the more critical discussions going on at https://github.com/python/core-workflow/issues. Specifically, https://github.com/python/core-workflow/issues/6 is working towards a solution for Misc/NEWS so if you care about the final solution you should participate there. After Misc/NEWS is solved the next step becomes solving the cherry-picking overhead with a more automated approach. We are also discussing closed branches to make the list of branches more manageable at https://github.com/python/core-workflow/issues/31.

Fourth, the lack of messages showing up on bugs.python.org <http://bugs.python.org> after a commit is being tracked at http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue613. I'm sure Ezio and Maciej would appreciate any help people may be able to volunteer to help in solving the problem.

Fifth, anything I missed? :)


_______________________________________________
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

_______________________________________________
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to