On 5/2/2017 10:07 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
On Tue, 02 May 2017 09:36:02 +0200, "M.-A. Lemburg" <m...@egenix.com> wrote:
IMO, it's much easier for everyone to just always point people
to BPO for discussions and keep PRs reserved for code reviews.
I agree with Mark-Andre here. It will take effort on our part to
make our culture be "discuss on BPO", but it will produce a much
superior history to what github PRs produce, so I think it is worth it.
It would easier to move discussion to bpo if there were a clickable link
from PR to bpo, just as there is in the opposite direction. I believe
that there is a workflow issue to add this, but last I knew, it was
bogged down in where to put the link, or something.
tjr
_______________________________________________
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
