Hmm, as an example, #2858, which seems to be about the AST (which I'm not familiar with). I don't particularly want to single this out as a problem, but it's an example of the sort of request that confuses me - I simply don't know what help I can offer. Maybe there is some suspicion that there might be a Windows element - but without some guidance, I'm not sure where to look.
Paul On 6 October 2017 at 16:38, Zachary Ware <zachary.ware+py...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 7:16 AM, Paul Moore <p.f.mo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I'm seeing a lot of review requests from github, asking for reviews >> from the Windows team. Many of the PRs don't as far as I can see have >> much Windows-specific about them. It doesn't bother me too much (I >> just ignore ones I don't have anything to say on) but I thought the >> idea of having the teams was to ask for specific experts to take a >> look when needed? >> >> As I say, it's not a big deal for me, but I'm curious how others think >> the review teams should be used. > > Do you have some examples of superfluous requests? I don't think I've > seen any, other than a rash of bad drive-by PRs that merge a > maintenance branch into master, which GitHub should be working on > preventing. See https://github.com/python/core-workflow/issues/168 > for more on that. > > -- > Zach > _______________________________________________ > python-committers mailing list > python-committers@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers > Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ _______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
