On 2017-12-07 22:28, Barry Warsaw wrote: > That’s good feedback! I want to be clear about the purpose of this image, > both in that it’s blessed and maintained by us, and that its focus is on the > Python library and application developer (primarily for testing purposes). > > So maybe: Python.Org Official Multiversion Development Docker Image > Doubleplus Good!
Why is there 'Docker' in the name? Is the container image restricted to Docker runtime or can I use it with lxc, systemd-nspawn, rkt, or any other container runtime, too? There are likely legal issues with the name, too. After all 'Docker' is a registered trademark of Docker, Inc [1]. I'd be careful and call it 'Python.Org Official Multiversion Development Supercalifragilistic Container Image' instead. Christian [1] https://www.docker.com/brand-guidelines _______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
