It looks like I am going to try and present a balanced summary and then open the floor for discussion. I also want to use the opportunity to start brainstorming about a better way to make decisions.
On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 9:10 AM, Victor Stinner <vstin...@redhat.com> wrote: > Sorry, I choose to reply to python-committers rather than python-dev > because I have been annoyed by the PEP 572 traffic on python-dev. > > 2018-04-29 22:45 GMT+02:00 Larry Hastings <la...@hastings.org>: > > In case it helps, we're planning on presentations on / a discussion of > PEP > > 572 at the 2018 Python Language Summit next Wednesday. (I'm assuming it > > won't be pronounced upon before then--after all, what's the rush?) > > Naturally the discussion isn't going to escape the room until it gets > > reported on by Jake Edge, but delegates at the Summit will hopefully > emerge > > well-informed and comfortable with the result of the discussion. > > Who is going to lead this discussion? Will we have at least one > developer in favor of the PEP to give a summary of the advantages? I > would like to make sure that we can get a fair summary of the past PEP > discussion. > > I'm not worried for the "dislike" part which may be correctly represented > :-D > > Note: I just got a notice of a strike at Air France next Tuesday, the > day I'm flighting to the US, and my 3rd and last flight of this trip > is cancelled. Oh oh. > > Victor > _______________________________________________ > python-committers mailing list > python-committers@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers > Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ > -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
_______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
