Hi Mariatta, Le 02/06/2018 à 01:07, Mariatta Wijaya a écrit : > > For those who missed it, some resources: > > 1. My language summit slides > (https://speakerdeck.com/mariatta/mariattas-python-language-summit-2018-presentation) > There are 3 bonus slides at the end which I did not get to cover, > because we were running late and it was lunchtime. (in the end, we were > 3 hrs overtime.) > Those can be discussed in core-workflow. > > 2. LWN article: https://lwn.net/Articles/754779/ > I will not be reading/responding to the comments in LWN. 🤐
Thanks for the pointers. I agree with the UI concerns about b.p.o. But I also agree with the response mentioned in LWN. Especially the lack of categorization in Github issues. I've used Github issues on other projects. It's fine when you have a small-to-medium number of open issues (say, no more than a couple hundreds). But I don't think it's usable for a project with several thousands issues open. At a micro level, the editing UI is pleasant to use. But at a more macro level, it's rather painful to navigate in a large number of issues. I wonder if other hosted services, such as Gitlab, offer a more sophisticated issue tracker. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
