I'm currently not in the mood to argue about VSTS' stability so I don't feel comfortable flipping that on as a requirement quite yet.
On Mon, 4 Jun 2018 at 08:33 Victor Stinner <vstin...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hum. For backports, should we stop to approve PRs in advance? > miss-islington currently ignores VSTS status and so may merge a > backport even if VSTS Windows fails. > > Victor > > 2018-06-04 17:02 GMT+02:00 Brett Cannon <br...@python.org>: > > Victor noticed that AppVeyor stopped building about 19 hours ago, > leading to > > it blocking all open PRs. I have gone ahead and switched off requiring > > AppVeyor for now, so please pay attention to at least the Windows VSTS > > status check to make sure you're not breaking Windows by accident. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > python-committers mailing list > > python-committers@python.org > > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers > > Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ > > >
_______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
