+1. For example for mypy I use the "triangular" git setup even though as a mypy core dev I could simply push my branch to the main repo.
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 11:49 AM, Donald Stufft <don...@stufft.io> wrote: > I’d also add that it is generally a good thing that people with power and > a voice (e.g. the core devs) are having a similar experience that an > external contributor would. This is our best line of defense against the > external contributor experience degrading to a bad place. By having core > devs share a similar experience, we can get feedback like the one about > AppVeyor and try to improve things for everyone, instead of simply giving > core devs a way to opt out of the pain. > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Jun 4, 2018, at 1:54 PM, Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote: > > > > Please realize that every time we have switched off CI, we have ended up > with a broken branch, so it's a trade-off between these occasional hiccups > or occasionally broken branches (and as Victor has pointed out, we are not > always good as a group about making sure we notice when stuff breaks). Also > note that because we now have branches that are almost always stable we > have users who actually run from a checkout directly instead of waiting for > a release (which also benefits us by helping to surface bugs earlier than > e.g. an RC). > > _______________________________________________ > python-committers mailing list > python-committers@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers > Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ > -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
_______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
