I think we should give the mentors a choice in this. Victor has chosen to
do it this way for Pablo. I don't know who (if anyone) is mentoring Cheryl.
I think Eric Snow is mentoring Emily (I am too, but my mentoring is not
very hands-on, and we only chat once every 3 weeks at most.)
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 1:10 PM Steve Dower <steve.do...@python.org> wrote:
> Not trying to dispute the result (I’d have posted earlier if I was really
> concerned), but it sounds like you’ve signed up to mentor someone for three
> months. Under normal circumstances, the commit bit comes at the end of
> mentorship, not at the start.
>
>
>
> Should we promote other mentees as well? I know there are a few who have
> been deliberately pursuing this recognition (as they attended the language
> summit and/or were specifically requested to attend the core sprint by
> their mentors).
>
>
>
> Top-posted from my Windows 10 phone
>
>
>
> *From: *Victor Stinner <vstin...@redhat.com>
> *Sent: *Tuesday, June 19, 2018 10:44
> *To: *python-committers <python-committers@python.org>
> *Subject: *[python-committers] Results of Pablo's promotion votes: Pablo
> ispromoted as a core dev!
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> The result of the vote to to promote Pablo Salingo Salgado as core
> developer
>
> after one week is positive: I declare that Pablo is now a core developer,
>
> congrats! I will follow the usual process to actually make him a core dev,
>
> and ask him to write a short introduction email to this list.
>
>
>
> But I also noted that Pablo lacks experience to be fully autonomous on
> merging
>
> pull requests, so I also requires that Pablo will have to be strictly
> mentored
>
> by me for 3 months. By strict, I mean that Pablo will have to ask me to
>
> merge any pull request. This strict mentoring may be extended depending on
>
> Pablo's progress. As Eric Snow wrote, I vouch for Pablo: don't hesitate to
>
> blame me directly if anything goes wrong :-)
>
>
>
> Giving more responsibilities to Pablo is part of the learning process.
>
> Reviewing as a core developer is different than a review as a contributor:
> core
>
> developers are expected to actually merge a pull request once they approve
> the
>
> change. Merging a pull request is a big responsibility and an investment in
>
> the long-term, because the committer is expected to fix regressions and
> issues
>
> related to this change for next months, if not next years.
>
>
>
> Note: Cheryl Sabella has also been identified as an active contributor who
> may
>
> be promoted as well. I am already discussing with her about that for 1
> month,
>
> but last month, Cheryl chose to wait. I will keep you in touch ;-)
>
>
>
> Vote results.
>
>
>
> Promote (+1): 8 votes
>
>
>
> * Victor Stinner
>
> * Terry Reedy
>
> * Carol Willing
>
> * Gregory P. Smith ("+0.5")
>
> * Eric Snow
>
> * Brett Cannon
>
> * Nathaniel Smith
>
> * Antoine Pitrou ("+0.5")
>
>
>
> Wait (-1): 1 vote
>
>
>
> * Berker Peksağ
>
>
>
> Neutral (0): 1 vote
>
>
>
> * Serhiy Storchaka ("-0")
>
>
>
> Victor
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> python-committers mailing list
>
> python-committers@python.org
>
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
>
> Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> python-committers mailing list
> python-committers@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
> Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
>
--
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
_______________________________________________
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
