Le 28/06/2018 à 13:04, Victor Stinner a écrit : > It seems like the PEP 572 discussions restarted on python-dev mailing > list with more than 100 emails in one week. > > Stupid idea: we created a mailing list just to fix os.random(): PEP > 522 and PEP 524, whereas these discussions were not the ones with the > most emails. Why not creating a new pep572 mailing list for the ones > who don't want to follow PEP 572 discussions?
PEP 572 is a language-wide change. Presumably those who don't want to follow discussions will still want to give their opinion (or informal vote) at the end. Which will give rise to other discussions... What strikes me is that we have such long-lasting and intense discussion about a feature which, whether approved or not, will not significantly change Python's popularity or appeal or ability to solve real-world problems. Perhaps this is a case where « Nature abhors a vacuum » : we're getting focussed on whatever comes up to fill the narrative of Python's evolution. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
