Would it be possible to have all proposals:

- How to determine the governance structure (PEP 10 or other approval process)
- The suggested governance structure

submitted by AOE August 31, 2018?

That would give everyone 40ish days to get their proposals in for either topic.

That would give everyone a full 30 day review period before the emerging 
October 1 decision moratorium. 

Perhaps we can post the timeline as an informational PEP by the end of July.


Suggested timeline:

July 31 AOE - Informational PEP on this timeline or emails to 
python-committers, python-dev as a less formal notification of timeline

August 31 AOE - Submissions due for proposals on governance decision making and 
governance structure. Proposals should be posted as PRs on either the PEP repo 
or a TBD repo.

Sept 1 - 30 Review period for all submissions by committers and community.

Oct 1 - Earliest possible decision on any proposals (perhaps a strawperson poll 
begins on Oct 1 and ends by Oct 7, if needed re: PEP 10, on all decision making 
proposals.

Oct 15 - 21 Strawperson poll on all governance structures, if needed.

Nov 15 - Target date for formalizing names to roles

I'm happy to write up the Information PEP for the timeline or draft an email 
message.

In addition, I am happy to assist in editing any proposals that folks wish to 
submit.



> On Jul 19, 2018, at 8:59 AM, Brett Cannon <br...@python.org 
> <mailto:br...@python.org>> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018, 22:32 Carol Willing, <willi...@gmail.com 
> <mailto:willi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Thanks Ethan for clarifying. Totally cool if that is the case.
> 
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018, 10:19 PM Ethan Furman <et...@stoneleaf.us 
> <mailto:et...@stoneleaf.us>> wrote:
> On 07/18/2018 09:40 PM, Carol Willing wrote:
> > I am in favor of a time limit. Yet, October 1 seems a bit too long for the 
> > initial governance decision (i.e. how to
> > decide how to decide). My perspective, based on transitions in non-profits 
> > and the corporate world, is that the longer
> > an organization let's it draw out then fear, uncertainty, and doubt creep 
> > in.
> >
> > We have PEP 10 in place for a strawperson vote. It seems as good as 
> > anything to use to determine how to make a decision.
> > Perhaps set a 30 day deadline to submit decision process recommendations. 
> > Then take a strawperson poll on each and at
> > the core sprint create a time window for specific proposals on structure be 
> > submitted before October 1.
> >
> > My concern if we leave how to decide until at least Oct 1 that the 
> > likelihood of completing this year is fairly low.
> 
> My understanding is that, between now and Oct 1, we'll all get our proposals 
> together for both how to decide, and what 
> to decide.  Then we have the first vote to decide how to decide, then maybe a 
> week or two later we use that mechanism to 
> decide on a governance model.
> 
> I had Carol's same worry that while it's great to have a "no sooner than" 
> date, we also can't let this drag on and we have no "settle by" date, else we 
> risk losing the faith of the community in our ability to come together and 
> make decisions (e.g. if I heard it took a year for a project to resolve this 
> then I would think there was some major divisiveness on the team).
> 
> So could we go with Nathaniel's idea of no decision before October, but any 
> proposals to be ready by then as well as Ethan suggested?
> 
> I would also propose we have a goal of at least choosing the governance model 
> by the end of the year (and a stretch goal to even have people placed into 
> created positions by then as well). I have no problem with sooner, but I 
> think it might be good to try to put _some_ upper bound on this.
> 
> -Brett
> 
> 
> 
> --
> ~Ethan~
> 
> _______________________________________________
> python-committers mailing list
> python-committers@python.org <mailto:python-committers@python.org>
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers 
> <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers>
> Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ 
> <https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/>
> _______________________________________________
> python-committers mailing list
> python-committers@python.org <mailto:python-committers@python.org>
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers 
> <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers>
> Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ 
> <https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/>

_______________________________________________
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to