On 8/2/2018 8:01 PM, Yury Selivanov wrote:
On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 4:43 PM Brett Cannon <[email protected]> wrote:
On Wed, 1 Aug 2018 at 17:58 Yury Selivanov <[email protected]> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 8:29 PM Mariatta Wijaya
<[email protected]> wrote:
[..]
I'm open to extend the dates, and even wait another year if we need to.
Or do folks want to come up with a completely different process than what I've
proposed?
In the end, I just want to know whether we will come to decision before 2019,
2020, 2021, 2022, .. ?
IMHO we should tweak the proposal to include just *one date for now*:
we want everybody interested to post their proposals by October 1st
(we can shift it + 2 weeks if people are on vacations right now).
I was actually going to email suggesting this but Mariatta beat me to the
subject. :)
I think you've confused Mariatta with me here :)
For me, I think aiming for October 1st to get the initial proposals in is a
good goal.
Yeah it looks like people don't oppose having October 1st as our first
*soft* sync point as long as we don't set any other deadlines right
now.
To sum up:
* We want everybody who has ideas about future Python governance model
to submit their initial proposals by that date.
* The discussion will start around October 1st and we'll figure out
what we do next (and when) based on its outcome.
I think this plan is reasonably relaxed, but at the same time will
gently motivate us to move forward.
I agree.
_______________________________________________
python-committers mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
