One data point in all of this is Victor's PEP 8015. Here on the mailing list I seem to be the first and only person to reply since the PEP was posted on Monday. But over on Discourse there have been 3 people who have replied and there's already been some back-and-forth.
So with a sample size of one, it looks like Discourse isn't discouraging anyone, otherwise I would have assumed people who don't want to start with Discourse would have simply started a discussion here on the mailing list about Victor's PEP. On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 at 20:24, Jack Diederich <jackd...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm worried about the new format combined with governance discussions. As > best I can tell 51 CPython committers have signed up for an account [I > think that is a big number, btw] but only 17 have posted anything; That 17 > is about 5 more people than put their name on a governance PEP. And maybe 5 > people have half the total posts. This does not feel like a discussion at > all. > > I don't think it was deliberate, but it looks like the new format is > actively discouraging everyone but those most deeply invested with the most > free time from participating. > > -Jack > _______________________________________________ > python-committers mailing list > python-committers@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers > Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >
_______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/