> On Nov 3, 2018, at 4:45 PM, Donald Stufft <don...@stufft.io> wrote: > > > > > One thing we need if we do go this route, is a single person to act as the > election supervisor. Their powers are limited basically they configure the > election, adding a description, the choices, etc and then they have the power > to start the election, add voters via email addresses, and then end the > election. All of these are manual action items, but the system automatically > generates result emails and voter emails and such. > > So if we go this route, we’d have to pick that person. I poked Ernest Durbin > to see if he’d be willing to do that. I figure we’d make a good candidate for > election supervisor (again, if we go that route) since he’s a PSF employee, > he’s well known enough in the community and generally trusted (he has root on > all the boxes pretty much, so he can do a lot of damage if he wanted) and > he’s not a core developer, so he’s about as close to a trusted, but neutral > party as we’re likely to find. He said he’d absolutely be willing to handle > that if we want. >
Here is a PR that implements this https://github.com/python/peps/pull/830 <https://github.com/python/peps/pull/830>. Not going to merge it myself, just figured I’d offer it as an alternative option.
_______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
