On 19Nov2018 0838, Paul Moore wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 at 16:32, Steve Dower <steve.do...@python.org> wrote:
FWIW, I'm thinking about withdrawing it because PEP 8016 captures my
highest priorities (specifically, core developers don't have a monopoly
on decision-making skills, and don't apply unnecessary constraints on
whoever leads in this PEP). The rest of my proposal is just enough
detail to be functional, but I'm not really wedded to it, so if there's
an alternative that mirrors the core values then I'll tell people to go
vote for that instead of mine.
Interesting. I considered the distinguishing feature of your proposal
to be that it explicitly *excludes* core devs from the council (to the
extent that you call out that feature as what distinguishes it from
8011). I wasn't keen on that, so I never really got much beyond that
aspect of your proposal to be honest - so it's weird to me that you
don't think it's particularly significant.
But thanks for the clarification.
Paul
That was mainly just the easiest way to deal with conflicts of interest,
but it was always a point that I'd bargain away if people were really
upset about it :)
I'm sure we'll find sensible ways to deal with people who want to get
elected just to pass their own PEPs.
Cheers,
Steve
_______________________________________________
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
