Thanks for the proposed text (even though I'm replying before I read it ;) .
As for the dates, it was intentional. Ends on a weekend so no one feels rushed if they procrastinate and only do open source on weekends, plus Dec 16 is a date people can reason about in terms of the middle of the month. On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 at 00:52, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote: > Oh yeah, one odd thing I noticed: according to PEP 8001, the vote runs > from Dec. 1 to Dec. 16, i.e., two weeks + two days. Is this... > intentional? Of course 16 is a good round number, but it still seemed > strange. Maybe it's supposed to give us a little wiggle room in case > the vote doesn't get sent out right at midnight on the 1st, while > still keeping the two week period? > > -n > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 8:03 PM Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > Since the vote's supposed to be starting in a few days, I figured it > > would be good to finish up the fiddly details and avoid any > > last-minute editing. So here's a draft proposal for the ballot > > instructions and options: https://github.com/python/peps/pull/844 > > > > I also set up a test vote on CIVS, so you can see how it will actually > > look: > https://civs.cs.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/vote.pl?id=E_f3dd3ec110515d32&akey=add219018ca56843 > > > > Please post any feedback on the PR or here. > > > > -n > > > > -- > > Nathaniel J. Smith -- https://vorpus.org > > > > -- > Nathaniel J. Smith -- https://vorpus.org > _______________________________________________ > python-committers mailing list > python-committers@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers > Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >
_______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/