On 12/10/2019 02:57 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 at 06:52, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:

The conversion to an inactive dev is something that core devs need
to be asked to agree to, and thus needs to be managed as a status
flag, not depend on commits to the repo.

All committers were asked to check the voter list in mid-November,
before the ballot period started:

[...]

So everyone *was* asked if they wanted to be kept as active for this
election

Being asked to check the rolls is not the same thing as being asked if one 
still wants to be considered active.  (I would suggest that this is definitely 
a time when explicit is better than implicit.)

And what if MAL had checked?  How would he have declared he still wanted to be 
active?

--
~Ethan~
_______________________________________________
python-committers mailing list -- python-committers@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-committers-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-committers.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-committers@python.org/message/4MGAV2R3T5O3MY4ATH2KC5LIGSJZYHHQ/
Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to