On Fri, 24 Jun 2005, Jim Gallacher wrote:
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
Yeah, we've got to be inline with the HTTP Project - prefork is the
default on unix systems, so we have to abide by it...
So I guess the solution is that we need to reserve two locks instead of
just one?
It seems a shame to waste locks if they are not going to be used. I don't
think there is a deadlock problem if lock index 0 is used for both DbmSession
file locking and psp cache file locking. In both cases the lock is held for a
short time. I'm not sure what impact this would have on performance, but I
guess it could become a bottleneck.
I'm +1 on this (assuming it works). I don't think this is going to be a
performance problem.
Grisha
