Graham Dumpleton commented on MODPYTHON-129:

Content handlers also seem to work differently in mod_python than Apache itself 
when using C handlers or even mod_perl.

Specifically, in Apache/mod_perl, if multiple modules have registered their 
desire to be the content handler for a request, Apache will try them each in 
turn until one returns OK or aborts the transaction with an error code. If a 
handler returns DECLINED, Apache moves on to the next module in the list.

In mod_python it will abort if DECLINED is returned and continue if OK is 

The big issue if this were to be fixed is are people using more than one 
handler in a phase and thus a fix would break existing code. Maybe it should be 
fixed to work how it really should, with a flag that can be turned on using 
PythonOption to allow it to run in the old suspect way.

Comments anyone?????

> HandlerDispatch doesn't treat OK/DECLINED result properly for all phases.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>          Key: MODPYTHON-129
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-129
>      Project: mod_python
>         Type: Bug
>   Components: core
>     Versions: 3.2
>     Reporter: Graham Dumpleton

> Todays daily bug report, or is it? ;-)
> The Python*Handler documentation says:
> """Multiple handlers can be specified on a single line, in which case they 
> will be called sequentially, from left to right. Same handler directives can 
> be specified multiple times as well, with the same result - all handlers 
> listed will be executed sequentially, from first to last. If any handler in 
> the sequence returns a value other than apache.OK, then execution of all 
> subsequent handlers is aborted."""
> That is, no matter which phase is being processed, mod_python will stop 
> processing them if a value other than OK is returned.
> Problem is that this isn't how Apache itself treats the result from handlers. 
> Apache actually implements two different ways for dealing with the result 
> from the handlers. Which is used depends on which processing phase is 
> occuring. This is all specified by the Apache magic macro code:
>   AP_IMPLEMENT_HOOK_RUN_FIRST(int,translate_name,
>                             (request_rec *r), (r), DECLINED)
>   AP_IMPLEMENT_HOOK_RUN_FIRST(int,map_to_storage,
>                             (request_rec *r), (r), DECLINED)
>   AP_IMPLEMENT_HOOK_RUN_FIRST(int,check_user_id,
>                             (request_rec *r), (r), DECLINED)
>   AP_IMPLEMENT_HOOK_RUN_FIRST(int,auth_checker,
>                             (request_rec *r), (r), DECLINED)
>   AP_IMPLEMENT_HOOK_RUN_ALL(int,access_checker,
>                           (request_rec *r), (r), OK, DECLINED)
>   AP_IMPLEMENT_HOOK_RUN_FIRST(int,type_checker,
>                             (request_rec *r), (r), DECLINED)
>                           (request_rec *r), (r), OK, DECLINED)
> What this gobblegook expands to are loops which will stop processing handlers 
> based on the result.
> For the AP_IMPLEMENT_HOOK_RUN_ALL macro, all handlers in the phase will be 
> run unless one returns something other than OK or DECLINED. Returning OK 
> means that it did something and it worked okay. Returing DECLINED means that 
> it didn't do anything at all. In both these cases, it still goes onto the 
> next handler in that phase. After that it will go onto the next phase.
> Returning an error will cause appropriate error response to go back to client 
> with any other handlers in the phase, as well as later phases being skipped. 
> Returning DONE is much like returning an error but Apache interprets it as 
> meaning a complete response was constructed and that it doesn't have to 
> generate any response.
> For the AP_IMPLEMENT_HOOK_RUN_FIRST macro, all handlers will be run only if 
> they all return DECLINED. In other words, if a handler returns OK it will 
> skip the following handlers in that phase and then move onto the next phase. 
> Returning an error or DONE is like above.
> In the case of mod_python, what it does doesn't fit into either. It is closer 
> to behaving like the AP_IMPLEMENT_HOOK_RUN_ALL macro except that it stops 
> processing further handlers in the phase if DECLINED is returned.
> As to what problems this causes, imagine you had registered multiple 
> authentication handlers which supported different authentication mechanisms. 
> This is the case where AP_IMPLEMENT_HOOK_RUN_FIRST  macro is used. The idea 
> is that each authentication handler would check the value associated with the 
> AuthType directive to determine if it should do anything. If it was not the 
> AuthType it implements, if it were a C based handler module, it would 
> returned DECLINED to indicate it hadn't done anything and that the next 
> handler should instead be tried. Each handler would thus be called until one 
> handler says that is for me, says the user is valid and returns OK or returns 
> an error rejecting it.
> If you wanted to write these multiple authentication handlers in Python you 
> can't do it. This is because the way mod_python works, if you return DECLINED 
> it would actually skip the remainder of the mod_python declared handlers 
> whereas you still want them to be executed. Apache would still execute any 
> other C based handlers in the phase though. The only way to get mod_python to 
> execute later mod_python handlers in the phase is to return OK, but if you do 
> that and it happens to be the last handler in the mod_python list of 
> handlers, it will return OK to Apache and Apache will then think a handler 
> successfully handled it and not then execute any subsequent C based handlers 
> in that phase.
> There are going to be other sorts of problems with phases implemented using 
> AP_IMPLEMENT_HOOK_RUN_ALL as well, as a handler that validly returns DECLINED 
> to say it didn't do anything will cause mod_python to skip later mod_python 
> handlers as well. If it were only C based handlers, that wouldn't be the case.
> In summary, it doesn't work how it probably should. 
> Note that the above relates to phases other than content handler. Still have 
> to work out what Apache does for content handler phase when there are 
> multiple handlers for the phase.
> No one has probably noticed these problems as no one seems to use mod_python 
> in a serious way for implementing these other phases, simply using mod_python 
> as a jumping off point for content handlers.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
For more information on JIRA, see:

Reply via email to