[ 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-165?page=comments#action_12375199
 ] 

Graham Dumpleton commented on MODPYTHON-165:
--------------------------------------------

Having mod_python directly know about other modules, such as mod_dav, means 
that there then exists a dependency on the other modules. This means that the 
core mod_python developers would need to be knowledgeable about all the other 
modules and it would increase the size of the code base dramatically. This 
would be a highly impractical situation as it would delay development and new 
releases of mod_python because any problem with support for one third party 
module would delay any release of mod_python as a whole. By exposing the 
internals and having something like mod_dav_python be separate, it can live its 
own life with the mod_python developers not needing to worry what happens with 
it. If mod_dav_python were never completed or people lost interest in it, it 
would not matter as no effort has been wasted on it by core developers and its 
aborted development wouldn't have impacted on mod_python core.

The mod_python core is quite simple at this stage, lets leave it this way 
rather than turning it in some bit of bloat ware of which the majority only use 
a small bit. :-)

> Exporting functions from mod_python to allow access to interpreters etc.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: MODPYTHON-165
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-165
>      Project: mod_python
>         Type: New Feature

>   Components: core
>     Reporter: Graham Dumpleton

>
> I have ranted a bit about this before:
>   http://www.mail-archive.com/python-dev@httpd.apache.org/msg01087.html
> and issue came up again recently on httpd mailing list so thought it was time 
> to note my ideas about it.
> The idea is that mod_python should export a number of functions using:
>   APR_DECLARE_OPTIONAL_FN
> macro so that they are available to other Apache modules.
> These functions would allow access to interpreter instances, the stored 
> Python request object for the current request, as well as functions for 
> creating server, filter and connection Python wrapper objects. The functions 
> and prototypes would be something like the following:
>   PyInterpreterState *mp_acquire_interpreter(const char *name);
>     Get/create the Python interpreter instance called "name". A thread state
>     object would be created as necessary.
>   void mp_release_interpreter(void);
>     Release the currently held thread state object for the interpreter.
>   PyObject *mp_get_request_object(request_rec *req);
>     Get the Python request object wrapper for "req". A new reference is 
> returned
>     which will need to Py_DECREF'd when no longer required. If the request 
> object
>     instance had already been created within mod_python or through an earlier 
> call,
>     it is a reference to the existing instance that is returned.
>   PyObject *mp_create_server_object(server_rec *server);
>     Create a new instance of Python server object wrapper for "server". This 
> is a
>     new reference and will need to be Py_DECREF'd when no longer required.
>   PyObject* mp_create_connection_object(conn_rec *connection);
>     Create a new instance of Python connection object wrapper for 
> "connection".
>     This is a new reference and will need to be Py_DECREF'd when no longer 
> required.
>   PyObject* mp_create_filter_object(ap_filter_t *f, apr_bucket_brigade *bb, 
> int is_input,
>                               ap_input_mode_t mode, apr_size_t readbytes);
>     Create a new instance of Python filter object wrapper for filter and 
> bucket brigade.
>     This is a new reference and will need to be Py_DECREF'd when no longer 
> required.
> It is actually quite simple to create these wrappers around current 
> mod_python internals. What it would effectively allow you to do is to create 
> an Apache module which is written principally in C code and which therefore 
> has access to all features of Apache. Ie., it could define its own directives 
> or even access stuff like mod_dav hooking mechanism. Having used all those 
> mechanisms to set it self up, when it executes it could acquire a Python 
> interpreter instance and make calls out to Python code to perform work. The 
> Python wrapped request/server/connection/filter objects can be supplied to 
> the Python code, as well as any other Python objects the module itself 
> creates which wrap up other parts of Apache, for example, mod_dav structures.
> The only part of the current mod_python that needs to be changed to support 
> this is that how the interpreter name is stored in the Python request object 
> needs to be changed, specifically it has to be removed. This doesn't mean 
> req.interpreter will not work, when that is accessed it would behind the 
> scenes link back to apache.interpreter for the name of the interpreter the 
> code is executing under and get it from there.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to