The src/mod_python.vcproj file hasn't been updated if you are trying to build it that way rather than with dist/build_installer.bat. If you really want to use the VisualStudio project file, you will need to add finfoobject.c file to the list of stuff to compile.
If someone can supply us with an updated vcproj file for Visual C++ 7.0 then we can look at including it, otherwise we don't have access to software to produce one ourselves. We did talk about deleting the project file at one point since there is the alternative way of building it. Graham Jeff Robbins wrote .. > Two build problems...one I could fix and one I couldn't > the fixable one is that on Win32 libapr.lib is called libapr-1.lib (not > sure > why) and libaprutil.lib is called libaprutil-1.lib > > the one I'm lost with is this: > > _apachemodule.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol > __imp__MpFinfo_New referenced in function _mp_stat > requestobject.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol > __imp__MpFinfo_Type referenced in function _setreq_recmbr > requestobject.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol > __imp__MpFinfo_FromFinfo referenced in function _getreq_rec_fi > > .\Release/mod_python.so : fatal error LNK1120: 3 unresolved externals > > What are these functions? > > - Jeff > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jim Gallacher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "python-dev list" <python-dev@httpd.apache.org> > Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 9:00 AM > Subject: mod_python 3.3.0-dev-20061109 available for testing (release > candidate) > > > > The mod_python 3.3-0-dev-20061109 tarball is available for testing. > > > > We are almost ready for a 3.3.0 release. It's been a while since we've > had > > extensive testing of trunk and I think it would be wise to have a > > preliminary testing round. Unless there are huge problems we'll do an > > official beta next week. If it looks *really* good we might even jump > > right to the release. > > > > At this point svn trunk should be considered frozen execpt to fix issues > > that testing exposes or minor documentation changes. > > > > Here are the rules: > > > > In order for a file to be officially announced, it has to be tested by > > developers on the dev list. Anyone subscribed to this list can (and > > should feel obligated to :-) ) test it, and provide feedback *to _this_ > > list*! (Not the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list, and preferably not me > > personally). > > > > The files are (temporarily) available here: > > > > http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/ > > http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/mod_python-3.3.0-dev-20061109.tgz > > http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/mod_python-3.3.0-dev-20061109.tgz.md5 > > > > Please download it, then do the usual > > > > $ ./configure --with-apxs=/wherever/it/is > > $ make > > $ (su) > > # make install > > > > Then (as non-root user!) > > > > $ make check > > > > Or for you Windows folks > > > > $ cd test > > $ python test.py > > > > And see if any tests fail. If they pass, send a +1 to the list, if they > > fail, send the details (the versions of OS, Apache, Apache-mpm, Python, > > the test output, and suggestions, if any). > > > > Please present your test results in the following format: > > +1 OS version, Apache version (apache mpm), Python Version > > > > For example: > > +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5 > > > > Presenting your information in a consistent format will help in > > tabulating the results. You can include additional information in each > > section, just don't use extra commas. There is no need to include the > > mod_python version in this string as that information is available in > > the email subject. Who knows, one day I may actually write a script to > > extract this information automatically. :) > > > > Thank you for your assistance, > > Jim Gallacher > >
