[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-202?page=comments#action_12449192 ] Jim Gallacher commented on MODPYTHON-202: -----------------------------------------
We seem to be going pretty far down the road with PythonOption and our new namespace, so I'm inclined to stick with that, unless there is some sort of performance implication. Jim > Allow mechanism used by global mutex locks to be specified. > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: MODPYTHON-202 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-202 > Project: mod_python > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: core > Affects Versions: 3.2.10 > Reporter: Graham Dumpleton > > When using experimental Apache ITK MPM, described at: > http://home.samfundet.no/~sesse/mpm-itk/ > global mutex locks will fail if Apache used semaphores because requests > against different virtual hosts run as different users and user will not have > permission to access the semaphore to lock it. See: > http://www.modpython.org/pipermail/mod_python/2006-November/022536.html > for original mailing list post about this from Sam Morris. > A suggested fix of finding a specific mechanism that works rather than > default used by Apache, seems to work: > http://www.modpython.org/pipermail/mod_python/2006-November/022537.html > http://www.modpython.org/pipermail/mod_python/2006-November/022538.html > http://www.modpython.org/pipermail/mod_python/2006-November/022539.html > If available MPMs with such constraints are going to appear, may make sense > to have an option to configure which allows one to override at compile time > the default mechanism used for global mutex locks so that it can be made to > match what may be required for a specific MPM that Apache is compiled to use. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira