On Thu, 2004-12-09 at 16:37 -0500, Phillip J. Eby wrote: > +1 on all the stuff you said, with one minor exception. Pyrex-the-language > is often unpythonically ugly and verbose at present.
Personally I have no problem with Pyrex's current tradeoffs, but given the amount of effort that this is going to inevitably involve, I'm sure that at least some of the changes you suggested would be necessary. So... +0 on your suggestions, I suppose. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
