On Tue, Jan 04, 2005, Delaney, Timothy C (Timothy) wrote: > > As a general rule, when an idiom has changed, do we want to state both > the 2.4 idiom as well as the 2.3 idiom? In the case of list.sort(), that > would mean having both: > > for key in sorted(dict.iterkeys()): > ...do whatever with dict[key]... > > and > > keys = dict.keys() > keys.sort() > for key in keys: > ...do whatever with dict[key]...
Yes. Until last July, the company I work for was still using 1.5.2. Our current version is 2.2. I think that the FAQ should be usable for anyone with a "reasonably current" version of Python, say at least two major versions. IOW, answers should continue to work with 2.2 during the lifetime of 2.4. -- Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ "19. A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing." --Alan Perlis _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
