On 7 Jan 2005, at 11:08, Bob Ippolito wrote:
10.3 or later. For older OSX releases (either because you build Python on 10.2 or earlier, or because you've set MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET to a value of 10.2 or less) we use the old behaviour of linking with "-framework Python".
Wouldn't it be better to link with the actual dylib inside the framework on 10.2? Otherwise you can no longer build 2.3 extensions after you've installed 2.4.
It would certainly be better to do this for 10.2.
This patch implements the proposed direct framework linking: http://python.org/sf/1097739
Looks good, I'll incorporate it. And as I haven't heard of any showstoppers for the -undefined dynamic_lookup (and Anthony seems to be offline this week) I'll put that in too.
--
Jack Jansen, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, http://www.cwi.nl/~jack
If I can't dance I don't want to be part of your revolution -- Emma Goldman
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
