On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 02:15:23PM +0000, Jp Calderone wrote:
> > I would like to see (optional?) support for this before your patch is
> > merged. I have a long-term interest in a Python-based service control /
> > init replacement / system management application, for use in specialised
> > environments. I could definately use this. :)
>
> Useful indeed, but I'm not sure why basic NETLINK support should be
> held up for it?
Point taken. I don't recall why I thought special code would be required
for this.
I was thinking a little more about how support might be added for older
kernels. No harm can be done by compiling in the constant, and it
doesn't cost much. How about:
#include <linux/netlink.h>
...
#ifndef NETLINK_KOBJECT_UEVENT
#define NETLINK_KOBJECT_UEVENT 15
#endif
/* Code assuming build host supports KOBJECT_UEVENT. */
Type thing.
Cheers,
David.
--
... do you think I'm going to waste my time trying to pin physical
interpretations upon every optical illusion of our instruments? Since when
is the evidence of our senses any match for the clear light of reason?
-- Cutie, in Asimov's Reason
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
