Phillip J. Eby wrote: > For example, if there were a weak reference dictionary mapping > objects to their (stateful) adapters, then adapt() could always > return the same adapter instance for a given source object, thus > guaranteeing a single state.
Wouldn't that tie the lifetime of the adapter object to that of the source object? Possibly naive question: is using adaptation to go from iterable to iterator abuse? That would be a clear example of per-adapter state. Just _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
