On 2005-01-15, at 18.06, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
At 05:32 PM 1/15/05 +0100, Just van Rossum wrote:
Phillip J. Eby wrote:

> >It's not at all clear to me that "sticky" behavior is the best
> >default behavior, even with implicit adoptation. Would anyone in
> >their right mind expect the following to return [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
> >instead of [0, 1, 2, 0, 1, 2]?
> >
> >   >>> from itertools import *
> >   >>> seq = range(10)
> >   >>> list(chain(islice(seq, 3), islice(seq, 3)))
> >   [0, 1, 2, 0, 1, 2]
> >   >>>
>
> I don't understand why you think it would.  What does islice have to
> do with adaptation?

islice() takes an iterator, yet I give it a sequence.

No, it takes an *iterable*, both practically and according to its documentation:

But it _does_ perform an implicit adaptation, via PyObject_GetIter. A list has no next()-method, but iter(list()) does.


//Simon

_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to