On Sun, 2005-01-16 at 22:12 -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote: > What do people think? (My main motivation for this, as stated before, > is that it adds complexity without much benefit.)
> *************** > *** 331,339 **** > def test_im_class(): > class C: > def foo(self): pass > - verify(C.foo.im_class is C) ^ Without this, as JP Calderone pointed out earlier, you can't serialize unbound methods. I wouldn't mind that so much, but you can't tell that they're any different from regular functions until you're *de*-serializing them. In general I like the patch, but what is the rationale for removing im_class from functions defined within classes? _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
