Steven Bethard wrote: > That sounds reasonable to me. I'll fix update to be a staticmethod. > If people want other methods, I'll make sure they're staticmethods > too.[1] > > Steve > > [1] In all the cases I can think of, staticmethod is sufficient -- the > methods don't need to access any attributes of the Bunch class. If > anyone has a good reason to make them classmethods instead, let me > know...
Great. I probably meant staticmethod. I don't use either much, so I don't really know the difference in the terminology. For a long time I stuck to 2.1 features for ipython and my other codes, and I seem to recall those appeared in 2.2. But you got what I meant :) Cheers, f _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
