Any objections to new peephole transformation that merges a store/load pair into a single step? There is a tested patch at: www.python.org/sf/1144842
It folds the two steps into a new opcode. In the case of store_name/load_name, it saves one three byte instruction, a trip around the eval-loop, two stack mutations, a incref/decref pair, a dictionary lookup, and an error check (for the lookup). While it acts like a dup followed by a store, it is implemented more simply as a store that doesn't pop the stack. The transformation is broadly applicable and occurs thousands of times in the standard library and test suite. Raymond Hettinger _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
